This would probably put describe a problem that is reportedly up to 80% of judges in Slovakia. By so. antidiskrimačného law known direct and indirect discrimination. Under the direct discrimination means the unequal treatment of persons in similar situations. And indirect impro theater discrimination, impro theater while being apparently impro theater non-discriminatory behavior, but discriminatory consequences. As an example of direct discrimination include non-recruitment based on skin color. And indirect discrimination if the conditions of admission indicated that the worker must be at least 175 cm. Determining the height criterion is not in itself discriminatory, because it seems to be neutral. However, it is discriminatory to women, because women are statistically less than men. What kind of discrimination is to act, in the case of judges? They contend that received lower salaries despite the fact that they were equally impro theater dangerous and hard work. So there has been direct discrimination. The problem impro theater is that the discrimination must be a reason. What was in the case of a discriminatory reason? Response pattern does not bring an action published diary sme.sk: District Court Bratislava I Zahradnicka Ul. No. The application states that the laws know only one kind of judges and pay differentials are not allowed. impro theater But then it is striking that the differences judges tolerated in the case of different valuation judges of the Constitutional Court and the district courts. Even the district court judges do not have the same salaries. So what is in their case discriminatory reason? Different race? Sex? Sexual orientation? No, prior to the expression it looks different job. Yes, absurd. impro theater And the result of this functional discrimination is unequal treatment manifesting in a different plate. And the amount of damages will not write here. I have already expressed the last time. If you do not know the degree of unconstitutionality, we can not determine the amount of damages. Then you absolutely legitimate to be initiated actions and colleagues impro theater from the regional impro theater courts each other, because what if someone has a 1 cent higher scores. Is well worth reading an article about the discriminatory activity Stefan Harabin.
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
This would probably put describe a problem that is reportedly up to 80% of judges in Slovakia. By s
This would probably put describe a problem that is reportedly up to 80% of judges in Slovakia. By so. antidiskrimačného law known direct and indirect discrimination. Under the direct discrimination means the unequal treatment of persons in similar situations. And indirect impro theater discrimination, impro theater while being apparently impro theater non-discriminatory behavior, but discriminatory consequences. As an example of direct discrimination include non-recruitment based on skin color. And indirect discrimination if the conditions of admission indicated that the worker must be at least 175 cm. Determining the height criterion is not in itself discriminatory, because it seems to be neutral. However, it is discriminatory to women, because women are statistically less than men. What kind of discrimination is to act, in the case of judges? They contend that received lower salaries despite the fact that they were equally impro theater dangerous and hard work. So there has been direct discrimination. The problem impro theater is that the discrimination must be a reason. What was in the case of a discriminatory reason? Response pattern does not bring an action published diary sme.sk: District Court Bratislava I Zahradnicka Ul. No. The application states that the laws know only one kind of judges and pay differentials are not allowed. impro theater But then it is striking that the differences judges tolerated in the case of different valuation judges of the Constitutional Court and the district courts. Even the district court judges do not have the same salaries. So what is in their case discriminatory reason? Different race? Sex? Sexual orientation? No, prior to the expression it looks different job. Yes, absurd. impro theater And the result of this functional discrimination is unequal treatment manifesting in a different plate. And the amount of damages will not write here. I have already expressed the last time. If you do not know the degree of unconstitutionality, we can not determine the amount of damages. Then you absolutely legitimate to be initiated actions and colleagues impro theater from the regional impro theater courts each other, because what if someone has a 1 cent higher scores. Is well worth reading an article about the discriminatory activity Stefan Harabin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment